Analysis might be described as interpretation, making sense of data, or transforming data. A common approach in most of these studies is general and inductive in nature, but does not comply with the very systematic and rigorous inductive approach of grounded theory.
In addition, it has been described that many researchers use a simple two-level analysis scheme followed by a more specific level. This means that the researcher can initiate the analysis based on the conceptual framework used in order to produce more inductive data, and the coding moves from the descriptive to the more interpretative and inferential codes.
Qualitative research studies typically produce very large amount of data that needs to be managed efficiently. Computer packages can improve the efficiency of data management. The use of computer packages, however, is claimed to distance the analyst from the data, 11 and may take the place of a close and careful analysis. Using a computer programme can lead to quantitative analysis instead of qualitative, for example, counting occurrences, giving more weight to more frequent events, and ignoring isolated incidences.
The researcher also has to be aware of the limitations of computer programmes. Ethnograph, Atlas and NUD. IST are the mostly used. IST and is user-friendlier, more suitable for individual research projects and more visually attractive than previous packages. Qualitative methods depend on both critical and creative thinking and the balance between the two in conducting the study and interpreting its results.
The role of the researcher is approached differently according to the type of research tradition used. On the other hand, in an ethnographic study, the effect of the researcher on the interview and the interaction is seen as inevitable and important in shaping the results of the study.
Although practising clinicians routinely interview patients during their clinical work, interviewing is a well-established technique in sociology and related disciplines. One of the differences between clinical and research-aimed interviews lies in their different purposes.
A good level of self-awareness is necessary in the researcher in order to reduce possible biases. Researchers in qualitative research need to consider how they are perceived by interviewees and the effect of features related to the researcher, such as class, race, and sex on the interview.
This question is more important if the interviewee knows that the interviewer is a doctor. It has been described that a patient, or someone who is likely to be become one, may give what he or she thinks is a desirable response, thinking that the doctor will be pleased. Health field research is generally quantitative and based on biomedical traditions and experimental methods. In this field, qualitative research is criticized for being subject to researcher bias and for lacking reproducibility and generalisability.
Many qualitative researchers neglect the importance of giving an adequate description of their theoretical concepts and methods used in their research. A systematic research method is also essential when conducting qualitative research. Rigour in qualitative research includes procedures taken at different stages of the research process including during data collection and analysis. Several procedures have been described to increase rigour in qualitative research.
For example, triangulation is commonly used as a way of validating of data. In triangulation, the researcher uses multiple methods, sources, researchers or theories to provide evidence that strengthens his or her study. Triangulation provides different ways of looking at the same phenomenon and adds credibility and confidence in the conclusions drawn from the study. There are two main types of triangulation, triangulation of sources and analyst triangulation.
When using this type of triangulation, the researcher compares the perspectives of people from different points of view. For example, studies in programme evaluation might compare the views of staff, clients or funding bodies. Triangulation with multiple analysts can also be used as a method of verification. Recently, there has been a greater acceptance of the qualitative approach, even as a stand-alone method, in health care research. Institutions that control funding for medical research have developed ethical guidelines for assessing qualitative studies which indicates formal acceptance of this form of research within an area previously dominated by quantitative methods.
Quality of health care is one of the areas where qualitative methods can be used. The concept of quality in health care is multidimensional and multifaceted and some of the questions asked related to the quality of care or services may not be acquiescent to quantitative methods.
It can also be used to identify and detect obstacles to change and the reasons why improvement does not occur. In addition, qualitative description can be a prerequisite of quantitative research, particularly in areas that have received little previous investigation.
Qualitative research is widely used to study issues related to doctor-patient interaction especially in general practice. Another area where qualitative research is being used in health care is to identify obstacles and barriers to practice change by exploring the reasons behind certain behaviours.
Examples are the study by Dumelow et al. Qualitative work can help in identifying cultural and social factors that affect health care positively or negatively. Such information can be helpful in improving service delivery. Good examples are the studies by Bush et al. There has been an increasing interest and use of qualitative research methods in primary health care and general practice articles.
In addition, qualitative research has been used in the assessment of new technology methods used in health care. For example, the studies on the implementation of the National Health System information technology programme in the UK.
Qualitative research methods are receiving an increasing recognition in health care related research. The use of qualitative research in health care enables researchers to answer questions that may not be easily answered by quantitative methods. Moreover, it seeks to understand the phenomenon under study in the context of the culture or the setting in which it has been studied, therefore, aiding in the development of new research instruments, such as questionnaires that are more culturally acceptable.
However, because health care related research has, for decades, been based on quantitative methods, the introduction of a new method requires researchers in health care who attempt to use it, to have a thorough understanding of its theoretical basis, methodology and evaluation techniques. National Center for Biotechnology Information , U. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J.
Received Jan 20; Accepted Feb 4. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Abstract Although relatively uncommon in health care research, qualitative research is now receiving recognition and is increasingly used in health care research with social and cultural dimensions.
Human Science for an Action Sensitivity Pedagogy. Denzin N, Lincoln Y. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Basic Concepts for Qualitative Research. Miles M, Huberman M. Qualitative methods in research on health care quality. Qual Saf Health Care. Mays N, Pope C. Reaching parts other methods cannot reach: An introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research.
Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Rigour and qualitative research. Qualitative Research Methods in Health Technology assessment: A Review of the Literature. Qualitative Research in Health. Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies of Qualitative Research. Guba E, Lincoln Y. Competing Paradigms in qualitative research. Denzin N, Lincoln Y, editors.
Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: Links with Infant Care Practices. Bishop Berkeley and the Adenotonsillectomy Engima: Lambert H, McKevitt C.
Anthropology in Health Research: From Qualitative Methods to Multidisplinarity. Qualitative research in health care: Revisiting Classic Qualitative Studies. Rethinking Methods in Psychology. Qualitative Interviews in Medical Research. Benson J, Britten N. Qualitative Semistructured Interview Study.
As such, it is probably most related to the method of participant observation. The field researcher typically takes extensive field notes which are subsequently coded and analyzed in a variety of ways.
Grounded theory is a qualitative research approach that was originally developed by Glaser and Strauss in the s. The self-defined purpose of grounded theory is to develop theory about phenomena of interest. But this is not just abstract theorizing they're talking about.
Instead the theory needs to be grounded or rooted in observation -- hence the term. Grounded theory is a complex iterative process. The research begins with the raising of generative questions which help to guide the research but are not intended to be either static or confining.
As the researcher begins to gather data, core theoretical concept s are identified. Tentative linkages are developed between the theoretical core concepts and the data. This early phase of the research tends to be very open and can take months. Later on the researcher is more engaged in verification and summary. The effort tends to evolve toward one core category that is central. Eventually one approaches conceptually dense theory as new observation leads to new linkages which lead to revisions in the theory and more data collection.
The core concept or category is identified and fleshed out in detail. When does this process end? Clearly, the process described above could continue indefinitely. Grounded theory doesn't have a clearly demarcated point for ending a study.
Qualitative research is a general term that includes several types of qualitative research methods that are employed, in order to provide an adequate explanation for certain phenomena and satisfying answers to the questions that such phenomena may raise.
Qualitative Research Methods with Examples. Qualitative research methods are designed in a manner that they help reveal the behavior and perception of a target audience with reference to a particular topic. There are different types of qualitative research methods like an in-depth interview, focus groups, ethnographic research, content analysis, case study research that are usually used.
Typical qualitative methods include: Focus group – A moderator-led discussion among a group of individuals who share a need, habit, or life circumstance relevant to the research issue(s) at hand. Typically one to two hours in length, a focus group discussion often includes from two to ten respondents. Six types of qualitative research are widely used in business, education and government organizational models. Phenomenological Model Describing how any one participant experiences a specific event is the goal of the phenomenological method of research.
What are some qualitative research methods? The three most common qualitative methods, explained in detail in their respective modules, are participant observation, in-depth interviews, and focus groups. Sampling Methods and Statistics Types of Qualitative Research Main Types of Qualitative Research. Case study. Attempts to shed light on a phenomena by studying indepth a single case example of the phenomena. The case can be an individual person, an event, a group, or an institution.