Skip Nav

Argument in Research Papers

Online Writing Lab

❶Even the proponents of the reintroduction program admit that moving wolves to Idaho and Yellowstone has nothing to do with "saving wolves. Even accidental plagiarism may result in a failing grade on a paper.

BEST ARGUMENTATIVE PAPER TOPICS

HOW TO SELECT DEBATABLE ARGUMENTATIVE TOPICS TO DISCUSS


It's like a competition, where the highest grade is your prize. Whenever you need immediate help with your assignment, turn to the professional writing service which can compose an argumentative essay on any topics in several hours. Speaking about the organisation and structure of the argumentative essay, we offer a five-paragraph paper outline.

Let your original ideas flow in this manner:. A conclusion is, no doubt, the most important part of the argumentative essay as you can either support the good impression or destroy it entirely. If you want to avoid typical mistakes, find valuable recommendations in this article. It all seems easy: You may keep your argumentative essays for your future job portfolio in case they are highly graded. We recommend fixing them a bit once your teacher returns the checked version to you. The next time, the process would seem much easier to you.

If you have no desire to waste time on selecting the best topic and writing the whole argumentative essay from scratch, don't forget that you have a loyal team of professionals by your side. To address the other side of the argument you plan to make, you'll need to "put yourself in their shoes. If you're having trouble accomplishing this task, try following these steps: We encourage the educational use of the OWL.

The Terms of Use explains the specific permissions granted. Ask yourself… How many people could argue against my position? What would they say? Can it be addressed with a yes or no? Can I base my argument on scholarly evidence, or am I relying on religion, cultural standards, or morality?

Have I made my argument specific enough? Worried about taking a firm stance on an issue? You MUST choose one side or the other when you write an argument paper! By addressing the opposition you achieve the following goals: A result of the breakdown is that "mates separate and some abandon pups in their haste to return to familiar turf" Carpenter Biologists believe that in order to form viable packs, they must capture wolves of different ages. The assumption is that when they calm down, the captured wolves will establish a new pack.

It is evident from biologists' concerns that wolves not only are intelligent creatures, but also have ties to family and fear of change, as humans do. The process used to capture wolves and relocate them in Idaho and Yellowstone has attempted to address these concerns.

In November , the U. This talent included using neck snares "equipped with 'stops'" which would prevent the wolves from being killed Neimeyer Neimeyer in International Wolf further explains, "Any live wolf restrained by a neck snare was quickly immobilized with drugs injected with a jabstick" Radio collars were then slipped around the animals' necks and these "Judas wolves" Neimeyer 13 , as they have been called, were followed back to the pack where agents selected the wolves of their choice for transport to Yellowstone and central Idaho.

The sedated wolves were then locked in traveling cages. Each cage measured no more than 2 feet by 3 feet by 4 feet Begley Unfortunately, due to unexpected litigation, the wolves were forced to remain in these cages for more than 24 hours. In the case of the wolves bound for Idaho, they endured more than 80 hours in their crates Johnson Given the elusive nature of wolves and the strong ties whichbind them to their own pack, all these measures seem invasive and extreme.

Such techniques are often necessary in attempts to save animals from extinction. However, the gray wolf is in no such peril.

Although the number of wolves in the lower 48 states is minuscule, 60, roam the ranges of Canada and about 7, thrive in Alaska Richardson Even the proponents of the reintroduction program admit that moving wolves to Idaho and Yellowstone has nothing to do with "saving wolves. She explained that the restoration of wolves would not "rescue us from our economic or ecological troubles, but neither will their presence contribute to them" Askins Askins claimed that the significance of returning the wolf to Yellowstone resided in its power as a "deeply and profoundly symbolic act" She told the House Committee on Resources:.

If the driving motivation for the reintroduction of wolves into Idaho and Yellowstone is the symbolic act of restoring a relationship of respect and cooperation with nature, the actions of capture and relocation do not fit the symbol. Capture shows no respect for the highly developed social structure of the pack.

Relocation denies the wolf's natural tendency to seek new territory when its own territory is overpopulated. The action appears to be more representative of a different kind of "dominion" rather than reciprocity between humankind and the animal kingdom. With the best of intentions, it is all too easy for human beings to cross the line between necessary concern and unnecessary control.

The environmentalist and author, Charles Bergman, makes this point in his book, Wild Echoes: The majestic gray wolf--skillful predator, nurturing family member--has been misunderstood to the point of endangerment.

Fear, hatred and the need to control the wolf's untamable wildness created an environment in which slaughter was not only acceptable, but advocated. There is no doubt that human beings bear responsibility for the protection of these magnificent creatures. However, the awe and admiration which have replaced the fear and hatred have not removed the human need to control.

When this need to control results in tactics which are invasive and which disregard the very nature of the wolf itself, the danger is that human interference will unintentionally diminish the very wildness environmentalists seek to preserve. The following interview with Dr. Marcella Cranford, veterinarian and expert in wolf behavior, was conducted by telephone on November 30, What is your opinion of the reintroduction of the gray wolf into Yellowstone National Park?

Well, it's one of the missing links. The overpopulation of the elk is a problem. Right now, we're feeding them. Not having wolves in Yellowstone is like a tear in the fabric of nature. What do you think are the repercussions for packs in Canada from which the wolves are taken? I'm hoping they're going to do it right. If you kill the best ones, the hunters, the pack won't make it.

Lone wolves don't make it. They survive as a family or they don't survive at all. What about the ranchers? They're very upset from what I have read. The ranchers should shape up! I mean, after all, we're paying money to subsidize their cattle. What about their concern that the wolves will kill their sheep and cattle?

They have more of a problem with feral dogs. They don't want to come near us.


Main Topics

Privacy Policy

Argument Essay #4. Click Here to View Essay "A Deadly Tradition" (PDF Document) Sample Argument Essay #5. Click Here to View Essay "Society Begins at Home" (PDF Document) Sample Argument Essay #6.

Privacy FAQs

Types of Papers: Argument/Argumentative While some teachers consider persuasive papers and argument papers to be basically the same thing, it’s usually safe to assume that an argument paper presents a stronger claim—possibly to a more resistant audience.

About Our Ads

Argumentative essay topics about legal matters are a popular choice. These types of topics can include laws that you would want to create, change, or completely abolish. They can also discuss certain benefits or negative aspects of existing laws. argument was vague or unsure. o WARNING: It's fine to introduce new information or quotations in your conclusions, as long as the new points grow from your argument.

Cookie Info

Wish to become an “A” Student? Argumentative essay is your ticket, and we will share the top winning topic ideas for your perfection. Argument in Research Papers An argumentative research paper needs to support your stand on an issue. An argumentative research paper is analytical, but it uses information as evidence to support its point, much as a lawyer uses evidence to make their case.